É uma evidência indisputável que a proibição das drogas para efeitos recreativos é um factor poderosíssimo para a emergência da corrupção numa escala equivalente aos lucros potenciais decorrentes dessa proibição. Vimos este fenómeno acontecer com o álcool mas também com o contrabando sempre que os impostos tornam qualquer produto de aquisição quase proibitiva. Há "n" exemplos em Portugal. Particularmente - e não serei o único - creio que os maiores defensores do proibicionismo são dos que mais ganham com a "guerra às drogas". E não me refiro apenas ao poder associado com os billions afectos a essa guerra. Um dia se verá que são os próprios cartéis da droga que financiam as campanhas pró-proibicionistas
No Guardian de hoje: How a big US bank laundered billions from Mexico's murderous drug gangs. Alguns excertos chamando a atenção do leitor para o factor X1000 que separa um million de um billion (os realces aão meus):
The authorities uncovered billions of dollars in wire transfers, traveller's cheques and cash shipments through Mexican exchanges into Wachovia accounts. Wachovia was put under immediate investigation for failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering programme. Of special significance was that the period concerned began in 2004, which coincided with the first escalation of violence along the US-Mexico border that ignited the current drugs war.
Criminal proceedings were brought against Wachovia, though not against any individual, but the case never came to court. In March 2010, Wachovia settled the biggest action brought under the US bank secrecy act, through the US district court in Miami. Now that the year's "deferred prosecution" has expired, the bank is in effect in the clear. It paid federal authorities $110m in forfeiture, for allowing transactions later proved to be connected to drug smuggling, and incurred a $50m fine for failing to monitor cash used to ship 22 tons of cocaine.
More shocking, and more important, the bank was sanctioned for failing to apply the proper anti-laundering strictures to the transfer of $378.4bn – a sum equivalent to one-third of Mexico's gross national product – into dollar accounts from so-called casas de cambio (CDCs) in Mexico, currency exchange houses with which the bank did business.
Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations," said Jeffrey Sloman, the federal prosecutor. Yet the total fine was less than 2% of the bank's $12.3bn profit for 2009. On 24 March 2010, Wells Fargo stock traded at $30.86 – up 1% on the week of the court settlement (...)
Adenda: O contrabando de tabaco regressa a EspanhaThe conclusion to the case was only the tip of an iceberg, demonstrating the role of the "legal" banking sector in swilling hundreds of billions of dollars – the blood money from the murderous drug trade in Mexico and other places in the world – around their global operations, now bailed out by the taxpayer.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário